Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Paper proves near-minimax rates for quantile distributional RL

Original title: Near Minimax Rate for Quantile Distributional Reinforcement Learning

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Zijie Cheng ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

A quantile fixed-point estimator matches local asymptotic minimax risk, with resolution-independent rates when reward densities are bounded away from zero.

The paper studies quantile distributional policy evaluation, approximating the return distribution by a quantile Bellman fixed point. With a generative model, the authors build an estimator from an empirical Markov decision process and prove non-asymptotic Wasserstein error bounds. When reward densities are bounded away from zero, they obtain a root-n high-probability bound for every resolution and Wasserstein order. They also show the estimator attains the exact local asymptotic minimax risk at each fixed resolution.

Key facts
  • Root-n bounds cover all resolutions and Wasserstein orders from 1 to infinity.
  • For orders above 2, one bound scales with resolution to the power 1/2 minus 1/p.
  • A regular one-state instance has resolution-independent local risk constants.
  • An endpoint-vanishing two-state case grows with resolution for every order above 2.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

In this paper, we study quantile distributional policy evaluation, where the return distribution under a given policy is approximated by the quantile Bellman fixed point $\bmη_m$. We investigate the statistical accuracy of estimating $\bmη_m$ across quantile resolutions under Wasserstein distances.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Zijie Cheng · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.