Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Classical clients can privately use one untrusted quantum server

Original title: The Entire Quantum Computer on a Classical Leash

arXiv cs.CRby Yael Tauman Kalai ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Assuming post-quantum LWE hardness, the protocol also yields classical verification of quantum sampling and remote state preparation.

A paper shows a classical client with no quantum hardware can treat a single untrusted, potentially malicious quantum server as its own quantum computer. The client can privately choose and run computations, prepare and process states, and store quantum memory on the server that persists across rounds. The construction is a maliciously secure two-party computation protocol between a classical client and a quantum server, assuming only the post-quantum hardness of learning with errors. The authors say this resolves classical verification of quantum sampling with negligible computational soundness error and remote preparation of arbitrary efficiently preparable states.

Unconfirmed: Results are theoretical; the paper does not report an implementation or concrete parameters.

Key facts
  • Only one untrusted quantum server is required.
  • Quantum memory on the server stays hidden from the server.
  • The client can act as a quantum party in interactive protocols.
  • Security rests solely on post-quantum hardness of learning with errors.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

We show that a classical client with no quantum hardware can use a single untrusted and potentially malicious quantum server as if it were its own trusted quantum computer. Through the server, the client can privately choose and run quantum computations, prepare quantum states, and process quantum states supplied by other parties.

arXiv cs.CR

By Yael Tauman Kalai · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.