Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Unauthenticated FortiMail command injection rated CVSS 9.8

Original title: Improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command

Fortinet PSIRT ()1
Part of a story covered by 12 sourcesFortinet revises multiple high-severity advisories; no CVEs namedMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Crafted HA join-request packets can run unauthorized commands; no CVE or versions are named.

Fortinet PSIRT revised FG-IR-26-200 on November 10, a command injection flaw (CWE-77) in FortiMail. An unauthenticated attacker may execute unauthorized code or commands through crafted HA join-request packets. Fortinet assigns a CVSSv3 score of 9.8. The snippet does not list versions, a fix, a CVE, or exploitation.

Unconfirmed: The snippet does not state versions, a fix, a CVE, or whether attacks have occurred.

Key facts
  • The advisory identifier is FG-IR-26-200.
  • The weakness is classified as CWE-77, not CWE-78.
  • No authentication is required.
  • The input is crafted HA join-request packets.
Security assessment · AI, from the article

Impact: unauthenticated attacker can execute unauthorized code or commands

ProductAffected
Fortinet FortiMail—
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

CVSSv3 Score: 9. 8 An Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') [CWE-77] in FortiMail may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HA join-request packets. Revised on 2026-11-10 00:00:00

Fortinet PSIRT

fortiguard.fortinet.com

Read the full article at Fortinet PSIRT

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.