12 Best CIEM Tools Compared (2026): Features & Pricing
Buyer's guide compares twelve CIEM tools; Microsoft discontinued Entra Permissions Management, while Tenable (Ermetic), CyberArk, and Wiz lead the 2026 scorecard.
The scorecard evaluates twelve cloud infrastructure entitlement management vendors on permission analytics depth, JIT enforcement, non-human identity coverage, pricing predictability, and bundle leverage. Tenable (Ermetic) leads at 4.70, followed by CyberArk and Wiz, while Microsoft's retirement of Entra Permissions Management (CloudKnox) forces existing customers into migration cycles. Pricing structures span per-identity, per-resource, per-workload, credit-based, and quote-based models.
- Microsoft discontinued Entra Permissions Management, forcing existing customers to migrate.
- Tenable (Ermetic) and Wiz lead platform CIEM in the weighted scorecard.
- Non-human identity counts drive CIEM pricing and should be audited before purchase.
- Britive prices standalone just-in-time access; CyberArk monetizes zero-standing-privilege enforcement.
Full article1,716 words · extracted from gbhackers.com · click to collapse
Quick Answer: CIEM bills per identity or per cloud resource, and the count that matters is non-human identities machines outnumber people many-fold and inflate quotes fast.
Tenable (Ermetic) and Wiz lead platform CIEM; Britive prices standalone JIT; CyberArk monetizes enforcement. Retirement alert: Microsoft Entra Permissions Management has been discontinued plan migrations, not renewals.
Entitlement sprawl is a compounding liability: every sprint mints new roles, keys, and service accounts, and each one is a quote-line in your next CIEM bill as well as a path in your next breach.
This scorecard compares twelve CIEM options from the buyer’s chair pricing mechanics, identity-count math, bundle leverage and delivers the market-shift warnings stale lists miss, starting with Microsoft’s retirement of Entra Permissions Management, which turns thousands of deployments into forced migrations. Scores are editorial (independent, unpaid, no lab); pricing described by structure only.
Table of Contents
1. How We Scored
2. The Scorecard
3. The 12 Vendors: Features & Pricing Mechanics
4. Procurement Comparison
5. Buying Guide
6.Cost-Focused FAQ
How We Scored
Five weighted criteria, buyer-facing: Permission-analytics depth (25%); JIT/enforcement value (25%) — does it fix or just report; NHI coverage (20%) — the count that drives quotes; Pricing predictability (15%); Bundle leverage (15%) — attach economics for incumbents. Editorial assessment; POC on your own accounts.
The Scorecard
| Vendor | Analytics | JIT/enforce | NHI | Price predictability | Bundle leverage | Weighted | Pricing structure |
| Tenable (Ermetic) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4.70 | Per resource/One bundle |
| Wiz | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4.10 | Per workload |
| CyberArk | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4.25 | Quote (platform) |
| Britive | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 4.10 | Per identity |
| Sonrai | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4.05 | Per account/quote |
| Prisma Cloud | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3.80 | Credits |
| SailPoint | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3.65 | Per identity (IGA) |
| Saviynt | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3.65 | Per identity (converged) |
| Microsoft (Entra PM) | — | — | — | — | — | Retired | Discontinued |
| Zscaler (Canonic-lineage) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3.20 | SSE add-on |
| Uptycs | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3.65 | Per asset |
| Stack Identity | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3.60 | Quote [VERIFY] |
The 12 Vendors: Features & Pricing Mechanics
1. Palo Alto (Prisma Cloud)
What you get. Net-effective permission calculation, unused-entitlement detection, and right-sizing recommendations inside the broadest CNAPP.
How it’s priced. CIEM consumes Prisma credits.
Procurement notes: for existing Prisma shops, CIEM is often the cheapest credible attach burn spare credits before buying elsewhere.
Buy when: Prisma is incumbent.
Push back on: credit-burn opacity per module.
2. Microsoft (Entra Permissions Management) — Retired
What you get. Nothing new Microsoft discontinued Entra Permissions Management (the CloudKnox acquisition), ending sales and retiring the service. Existing customers face migration, not renewal.
How it’s priced. No longer sold.
Procurement notes: if it’s in your estate, budget a replacement cycle now; Microsoft points multicloud permission work toward partners/ecosystem. This retirement is the single most important fact on 2026 CIEM shortlists.
Migration shortlist: Tenable, Britive, CyberArk, Sonrai.
3. Wiz
.webp)
What you get. Effective-permission analysis fused with the Security Graph entitlement risk ranked by exposure context (admin-capable identity × internet-facing workload).
How it’s priced. Part of per-workload platform tiers.
Procurement notes: if Wiz already scans your estate, CIEM analytics may be a tier upgrade, not a new product price the delta, not the sticker.
Buy when: Wiz is your CNAPP.
Push back on: paying twice for identity analytics you hold elsewhere.
4. Zscaler (Canonic-lineage)
What you get. SaaS/app-integration permission governance folded into Zscaler’s platform closer to SaaS-entitlement control than full IaaS CIEM.
How it’s priced. SSE add-on.
Procurement notes: scope honestly: it complements IaaS CIEM rather than replacing it.
Buy when: Zscaler consolidation + SaaS-app permission focus.
Push back on: IaaS-CIEM claims beyond its lane.
5. Sonrai Security

What you get. Identity-to-data path graphing plus the Cloud Permissions Firewall one-click quarantine of unused permissions at scale, an enforcement model most analytics tools lack.
How it’s priced. Per cloud account/quote.
Procurement notes: the permissions-firewall ROI story (mass least-privilege in days) is quantifiable demand a before/after metric in POC.
Buy when: enforcement-at-scale is the goal.
Push back on: account-count definitions across org units.
6. Uptycs
What you get. Cloud identity analytics inside its unified telemetry lake CIEM signals correlated with endpoint and workload behavior.
How it’s priced. Per asset.
Procurement notes: value is the correlation, not standalone CIEM depth price it as part of platform consolidation.
Buy when: already consolidating on Uptycs.
Push back on: CIEM-only purchases here.
7. CyberArk (Secure Cloud Access)
What you get. JIT, zero-standing-privilege access to cloud consoles with session context CIEM executed as privileged access, in the platform auditors already know.
How it’s priced. Platform quote (per user/workload elements).
Procurement notes: strong attach economics inside CyberArk renewals; enforcement depth justifies premium where audit pressure is high.
Buy when: ZSP enforcement + CyberArk incumbency.
Push back on: platform minimums for narrow use cases.
8. Stack Identity
What you get. Shadow-access detection and identity attack-path analytics a young specialist attacking the same seam as the absorbed pioneers.
How it’s priced. Quote.
Procurement notes: early-stage leverage: aggressive pricing, but demand reference customers and roadmap-continuity comfort.
Buy when: innovation-track evaluation alongside incumbents.
Push back on: multi-year terms with unproven continuity.
9. SailPoint
What you get. Cloud entitlements folded into IGA certification campaigns and lifecycle for cloud roles, strongest where audit evidence drives the purchase.
How it’s priced. Per governed identity (IGA model).
Procurement notes: if SailPoint already governs your workforce, adding cloud identities to the count is the cheap path to auditor-ready CIEM.
Buy when: compliance-led CIEM.
Push back on: paying analytics-platform rates for certification-only needs.
10. Britive
What you get. Standalone JIT/ephemeral-access specialist checkout-style temporary privileges across clouds and SaaS, born for the NHI era.
How it’s priced. Per identity, published-tier friendly.
Procurement notes: the cleanest pure-play pricing in the field a strong benchmark quote against platform bundles.
Buy when: JIT-first strategy without platform lock.
Push back on: connector-count gating in tiers.
11. Tenable (Ermetic)

What you get. The deepest dedicated CIEM lineage effective-permission analytics, risky-combination detection, JIT workflows now bundled into Tenable One exposure pricing.
How it’s priced. Per resource standalone or inside Tenable One.
Procurement notes: existing Tenable VM customers should force the One-bundle rate standalone quotes leave money on the table.
Buy when: analytics depth is the requirement (and the Entra PM migration landing zone).
Push back on: double-paying for scanning you already license.
12. Saviynt

What you get. Converged IGA+CIEM+app-GRC in one SaaS entitlement analytics with certification and SoD in the same data model.
How it’s priced. Per identity, converged-platform tiers.
Procurement notes: convergence saves platform count; ensure cloud-identity pricing doesn’t double-count humans already licensed.
Buy when: one platform for governance + cloud entitlements.
Push back on: module tiering that splits the convergence pitch.
Procurement Comparison
| Vendor | Status | Billable unit | Enforcement (JIT/ZSP) | Migration landing zone for Entra PM? |
| Prisma Cloud | Active | Credits | Partial | Yes (incumbents) |
| Entra PM | Retired | — | — | Source, not destination |
| Wiz | Active | Workload | Partial | Yes |
| Zscaler | Active | SSE seat | Partial | SaaS-scope only |
| Sonrai | Active | Account | Yes (firewall) | Yes |
| Uptycs | Active | Asset | Partial | Platform-fit only |
| CyberArk | Active | Platform quote | Best-tier | Yes |
| Stack Identity | Verify | Quote | Yes | Diligence first |
| SailPoint | Active | Identity | Via lifecycle | Compliance-led |
| Britive | Active | Identity | Best-tier JIT | Yes |
| Tenable (Ermetic) | Active | Resource/One | Yes | Primary |
| Saviynt | Active | Identity | Via lifecycle | Compliance-led |
Buying Guide
Count NHIs before you quote. Service accounts and workload identities drive per-identity bills inventory them first or your budget dies at true-up.
Treat the Entra PM retirement as the market event it is: affected estates should run Tenable/Britive/CyberArk/Sonrai bake-offs now, and every buyer should read it as a warning about platform-vendor commitment to this category.
Prefer enforcement to reporting: JIT and permission-quarantine (Britive, CyberArk, Sonrai, Tenable) shrink risk and future bills; analytics alone just documents sprawl.
Exploit incumbency: Prisma credits, Wiz tiers, Tenable One, SailPoint identity counts the cheapest CIEM is usually an upgrade inside something you already run.
Free floor: AWS IAM Access Analyzer, GCP Policy Intelligence, and Entra’s built-in recommendations cost nothing and shrink the problem before any vendor counts it.
Cost-Focused FAQ
How is CIEM priced?
Per identity (Britive, SailPoint, Saviynt), per resource (Tenable), per account (Sonrai), per workload/credits inside CNAPPs (Wiz, Prisma), or platform quotes (CyberArk). Non-human identity counts are the quote-driver everywhere inventory them first.
What happened to Microsoft Entra Permissions Management?
Microsoft retired it the CloudKnox-lineage multicloud CIEM is discontinued, with sales ended and the service sunset. Existing customers need migration plans; Tenable, Britive, CyberArk, and Sonrai are the natural landing zones.
What’s the cheapest credible CIEM path?
Free native tools (Access Analyzer, Policy Intelligence) plus the CIEM tier of a platform you already license (Prisma credits, Wiz upgrade, Tenable One). Standalone spend is best reserved for enforcement (Britive-class JIT).
Why do non-human identities blow up CIEM quotes?
They outnumber humans many-fold and mint continuously via IaC and CI/CD. Per-identity pricing without an NHI cap or tiering clause is an uncapped liability negotiate the definition.
Analytics vs enforcement — which is worth more?
Enforcement: quarantining unused permissions (Sonrai) or replacing standing access with JIT (Britive, CyberArk, Tenable) reduces both breach probability and future audit findings. Reports alone age badly.
Is CIEM a standalone market anymore?
Barely pioneers were absorbed (Ermetic→Tenable, Authomize→Delinea, CloudKnox→retired) and CNAPPs bundled the rest. Standalone survivors (Britive, Sonrai, Stack Identity) win on enforcement depth and pricing agility.
Bottom Line
CIEM buying in 2026 is identity-count math plus one headline: Entra Permissions Management is gone, and its migrations reset the market.
Tenable (Ermetic) is the analytics-plus-JIT benchmark and primary landing zone; Britive and Sonrai sell enforcement with the cleanest pure-play economics; CyberArk monetizes ZSP where auditors watch; Wiz and Prisma make CIEM an upgrade line for incumbents; SailPoint/Saviynt serve compliance-led counts; Stack Identity earns diligence-gated consideration.
Count your NHIs, cap the definitions, and buy the tool that deletes permissions not the one that just graphs them.
More on GBHackers:
• Best CNAPP Platforms, Compared and Priced
• Best PAM Solutions, Compared and Priced
• Best IGA Tools, Compared and Priced
• Best IAM Solutions, Compared and Priced
• Best CSPM Tools, Compared and Priced
• Best Secrets Management Tools, Compared and Priced
• Best ITDR Tools, Compared and Priced
• Best AWS Security Tools, Compared and Priced
• Best Azure Security Tools, Compared and Priced
Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://gbhackers.com/12-best-ciem-tools-compared-2026-features-pricing/