Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Uncensored AI sold on hacking forum as alternative to ChatGPT and Claude jailbreaks

Help Net Securityby Sinisa Markovic ()2 min read2 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3Summaries by Vani AI

Sophos found Luciferus, an uncensored AI subscription service likely built on Qwen, sold on the Exploit forum and capable of generating working malware code.

Sophos Counter Threat Unit found an ad for 'Luciferus' posted August 24 on the Exploit forum by a persona named 'Optimus_Prime', claiming a proprietary 120-billion-parameter model that answers requests without ethical restrictions. Sophos assesses with low confidence it is based on Alibaba's open-source Qwen family. Forum tiers cost $35-$75/month, while the website lists Junior/Middle/Pro tiers at $22-$47.14; a test prompt on the Junior tier returned Python remote access trojan source code. Sophos warns such services lower barriers for less skilled cybercriminals and outlast jailbroken mainstream LLMs.

Key facts
  • Luciferus marketed on Exploit forum as uncensored ChatGPT/Claude jailbreak alternative
  • Sophos assesses low confidence the 120B-parameter claim masks a Qwen-based fine-tune
  • Junior tier generated Python remote access trojan code on request
  • Pricing tiers range from $22 to $75 monthly across forum and website
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

2 min read at helpnetsecurity.com

A new AI subscription service called Luciferus is being marketed on a hacking forum as an alternative to jailbreaking ChatGPT or Claude, Sophos found. The Counter Threat Unit (CTU) spotted the advertisement on August 24 on the Exploit forum, posted by a persona going by “Optimus_Prime.” The account joined the forum on April 18 and has since published 21 posts.

Help Net Security

By Sinisa Markovic · helpnetsecurity.com

Read the full article at Help Net Security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.