Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Croatian IACS integrators describe uneven cybersecurity practices

Original title: Cybersecurity Practices in Industrial Automation and Control Systems: a Study of Croatian System Integrators

arXiv cs.CRby Filip Katulić ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Integrators serving energy, chemical, pharmaceutical, and food clients described low owner awareness and split views on NIS2.

A study of Croatian industrial automation and control system integrators used three focus groups covering energy, chemical and pharmaceutical, and food and beverage clients. Participants described limited owner awareness and differences between smaller and larger firms and between domestic and foreign companies. Expectations about NIS2 were split between improved security and minimal, cost-driven compliance. The authors frame the results as a basis for more practical IACS practices.

Unconfirmed: Findings reflect participant perceptions from three focus groups, not measured security postures.

Key facts
  • Three focus groups covered energy, chemical, pharmaceutical, and food clients.
  • Participants reported limited cybersecurity awareness among IACS owners.
  • Views differed between smaller and larger firms and domestic and foreign firms.
  • Expectations split between better security and minimal NIS2 compliance.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Given the increasing frequency of industrial cybersecurity incidents, governments, industry, and the research community are all working to find ways to protect industrial automation and control systems (IACSs).

arXiv cs.CR

By Filip Katulić · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.