Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Classical verifier checks a beyond-PH quantum language via an oracle

Original title: Classical Verification of Quantum Computation Beyond the Polynomial Hierarchy

arXiv cs.CRby Atul Mantri ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

The public-coin protocol has perfect completeness and soundness error at most 1/4, with near-optimal message count.

Relative to a classical oracle, the paper shows a classical polynomial-time verifier can check a language outside the polynomial hierarchy that quantum polynomial time decides exactly. The protocol is public-coin, with perfect completeness and soundness error at most 1/4. The language is a variant of recursive Fourier sampling in which code tables encode secrets that address data tables, and the oracle stores only the leaves. A new switching theorem handles the correlated restrictions used in the proof.

Unconfirmed: The result is relative to an oracle, not an unconditional classical verifier.

Key facts
  • No computational assumptions are used beyond the chosen oracle.
  • Message and query counts can match any unbounded polynomial-time bound.
  • The quantum algorithm recovers every secret exactly.
  • For tall instances, huge constant-depth circuits barely notice a flipped leaf.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

It is not known whether a classical polynomial-time verifier can verify arbitrary polynomial-time quantum computations with an efficient quantum honest prover without computational assumptions. We show that, relative to a classical oracle, such verification is possible for a language beyond the polynomial hierarchy that is decided exactly in quantum polynomial time.

arXiv cs.CR

By Atul Mantri · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.