ZeroHour
arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLpublished ()ingested Ayan Majumdar1

Can Foundation Models Moderate Online Content? Evaluating Instruction- vs. Example-Driven Policy Operationalization

infoAI researchimportance 28
AI summary · glm-5.3-flash

ModerationBench shows foundation models can nearly triple Bluesky's moderation F1 (0.60 vs 0.22), with instruction- and example-driven guidance performing comparably.

Researchers built ModerationBench, a new benchmark of 4,000 manually annotated in-the-wild posts from Bluesky, to test whether foundation models can reliably operationalize content moderation policies. They systematically compare instruction-driven guidance (reasoning from policy precepts) with example-driven guidance (generalizing from precedents) for Vision-Language Models. Both paradigms achieve comparable peak effectiveness, and foundation models nearly triple the F1 of Bluesky's deployed moderation system on Random Posts (0.60 vs 0.22).

  • ModerationBench contains 4,000 manually annotated real-world Bluesky posts for moderation policy evaluation.
  • Instruction- and example-driven VLM paradigms reach comparable peak effectiveness.
  • Foundation models triple the deployed moderation system's F1 (0.60 vs 0.22) on Random Posts.
  • Results chart a path toward reliable, adaptable policy operationalization at scale.
OrganizationsBluesky
Full article141 words · extracted from arxiv.org · click to collapse

The growing complexity of content moderation policies presents a critical challenge for their consistent operationalization. While foundation models possess the basic capabilities needed to confront this challenge, whether they can reliably moderate online content remains an unanswered question. In this paper, we systematically compare two competing paradigms for Vision-Language Model (VLM) guidance: an instruction-driven approach where models reason from policy precepts, and an example-driven approach where they generalize from prior precedents. We ground this investigation in ModerationBench, a new benchmark of 4,000 manually annotated, in-the-wild posts from the Bluesky platform. Our experiments reveal that foundation models can substantially outperform Bluesky's deployed moderation system, nearly tripling its $F_1$ score (0.60 vs. 0.22) on Random Posts in the benchmark, with both instruction- and example-driven paradigms achieving comparable peak effectiveness. Our findings thus chart a path toward reliable and adaptable policy operationalization at scale.

Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10410