Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour
Toolsinfo

Teams calls are about to get a lot harder to fake

Help Net Securityby @helpnetsecurity ()1 min read1
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Microsoft will roll out Brand Impersonation Protection in Teams Calling from mid-May 2026, warning users about suspicious inbound VoIP calls impersonating trusted brands.

Microsoft Teams Calling is gaining Brand Impersonation Protection, which evaluates inbound VoIP calls from first-time external callers for signs of brand impersonation and displays warnings before users answer high-risk calls. The feature rolls out from mid-May 2026 with completion expected by late May 2026, is enabled by default, and requires no administrative action. Users can accept, block, or end flagged calls, and alerts may continue throughout a call if suspicious activity persists. Microsoft recommends preparing helpdesk teams and updating security awareness materials ahead of deployment.

Key facts
  • Feature evaluates inbound VoIP calls for brand impersonation and warns users before answering.
  • Rolls out mid-to-late May 2026, enabled by default, no admin action required.
  • Users can accept, block, or end flagged calls; alerts may persist during calls.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at helpnetsecurity.com

Microsoft Teams Calling is getting a new feature that will warn users about suspicious inbound VoIP calls from first-time external callers who might be impersonating trusted brands. Brand Impersonation Protection is scheduled to roll out in mid-May 2026 and is expected to complete by late May 2026. The company says the feature aims to reduce social engineering risks and strengthen tenant security.

Help Net Security

By @helpnetsecurity · helpnetsecurity.com

Read the full article at Help Net Security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.