Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Philips Hue Bridge Pro SQL injection allows remote code execution

Original title: ZDI-26-891: Philips Hue Bridge Pro SQL Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

ZDI Published Advisories ()2
Part of a story covered by 3 sourcesZDI publishes three Philips Hue Bridge Pro vulnerability advisoriesMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Network-adjacent attackers can bypass required authentication; ZDI rates CVE-2026-118632 at CVSS 8.0.

The Zero Day Initiative published ZDI-26-891, a SQL injection flaw in Philips Hue Bridge Pro that can lead to arbitrary code execution. The attacker must be network-adjacent. Authentication is required, but ZDI says the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed. The flaw is CVE-2026-118632 with a CVSS rating of 8.0. No versions or patch are named.

Unconfirmed: Affected versions and whether a fix is available are not stated.

Key facts
  • The advisory is ZDI-26-891 and the CVE is CVE-2026-118632.
  • ZDI assigned a CVSS rating of 8.0.
  • Attackers must be network-adjacent and can bypass authentication.
Security assessment · AI, from the article

Impact: arbitrary code execution after authentication bypass

ProductAffected
Philips Hue Bridge Pro—
Analyze CVE-2026-118632 with Vani AIImpact, affected versions, exploitation, mitigations and detection

Vulnerabilities mentioned

All
CVEVulnerabilityCVSSEPSSSignalsPublished
CVE-2026-118632
———

From the original article

This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Philips Hue Bridge Pro. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed. The ZDI has assigned a CVSS rating of 8.

ZDI Published Advisories

zerodayinitiative.com

Read the full article at ZDI Published Advisories

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.