Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

From Alignment to Access Control: A Framework for GenAI Policy Enforcement

arXiv cs.CRby Nathalie Baracaldo ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

A framework maps generative AI policy enforcement from model alignment to access control.

Nathalie Baracaldo surveys policy enforcement for generative AI chat and agent applications, arguing that inconsistent meanings of policy produce siloed controls inadequate for compliance. The paper proposes a method to analyze existing enforcement approaches and issues recommendations for the community. It is a companion to the author's USENIX Security 2026 Enigma talk on a unified view from model alignment to access control. It notes that safety mechanisms have lagged rapid capability growth and that real incidents have already occurred.

Key facts
  • Frames GenAI policy from alignment through access control
  • Argues inconsistent policy definitions create siloed controls
  • Companion to a USENIX Security 2026 Enigma talk
  • Recommends systematic analysis of enforcement approaches
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Generative AI (GenAI) applications have flourished enabling users to chat with large language models, and to create agents to act on their behalf for a variety of tasks. The pace of development of capabilities in this field is incredibly fast with security and safety taking a back seat. Unfortunately, the slower pace at which security and safety mechanisms have evolved has led to real incidents.

arXiv cs.CR

By Nathalie Baracaldo · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.