Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

The Lattice of Transition Laws

Hugging Face daily papersby T. Y. Tsui, Jiatao Gu, Lingjie Liu ()1 min read1
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Researchers model diffusion and autoregressive decoding as lattice paths and predict schedule cost from data geometry.

The paper treats diffusion, autoregression, and hybrids as paths on a single corruption lattice, defining a schedule's cost as dependence discarded by parallel steps. It argues the fewest zero-cost steps equal the data graph's treedepth: logarithmic in sequence length and linear in grid side length. With fewer steps, every schedule pays a positive cost, ranked before decoding via a pairwise-dependence kernel estimated from pretrained weights. Predictions are checked on text, image, and video generation, and code is released on GitHub.

Key facts
  • Diffusion, AR, and hybrids are paths on one corruption lattice.
  • Zero-cost step count equals graph treedepth for Markov data.
  • Treedepth is logarithmic in sequence length, linear in grid side.
  • Pairwise-dependence kernel ranks schedules before decoding.
  • Rankings mostly verified on text, image, and video generation.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at huggingface.co

Diffusion and autoregression (AR) have long been seen as different categories of generative models, with diffusion specialising in continuous fields and AR specialising in discrete tokens. Recent work seeks to combine the advantages of the two models, and each hybrid fixes its decoding schedule by design.

Hugging Face daily papers

By T. Y. Tsui, Jiatao Gu, Lingjie Liu · huggingface.co

Read the full article at Hugging Face daily papers

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.