Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Everybody's Lost Their Minds

Hacker News · securityby ibobev ()6 min read1
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

A veteran security engineer argues AI-driven vulnerability discovery is not making organizations safer because patching and basic security hygiene remain the real bottleneck.

The author, a long-time security practitioner, criticizes the industry's rush into AI-assisted vulnerability research, noting that Anthropic and OpenAI programs like Glasswing, Daybreak, Athena, and Akrites consumed millions of dollars of engineering time and surfaced thousands of vulnerabilities, only a fraction of which were reported upstream. He argues that finding vulnerabilities was never the bottleneck; patching, asset inventory, and attack surface management remain the true problems. The post also critiques AI hype, agentic workflows, anthropomorphic media coverage, and AI companies' calls for their own regulation.

Key facts
  • AI vulnerability discovery consumed millions in engineering hours and found thousands of flaws.
  • Finding vulnerabilities is not the bottleneck; getting packages patched is.
  • Better investment would be asset inventory, automated updates, and attack surface enumeration.
  • Author criticizes AI companies' self-regulation calls, environmental impact, and agentic workflows.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

6 min read at netmeister.org
Hacker News · security

By ibobev · netmeister.org

Read the full article at Hacker News · security

This source shares headlines only. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.