Everybody's Lost Their Minds
A veteran security engineer argues AI-driven vulnerability discovery is not making organizations safer because patching and basic security hygiene remain the real bottleneck.
The author, a long-time security practitioner, criticizes the industry's rush into AI-assisted vulnerability research, noting that Anthropic and OpenAI programs like Glasswing, Daybreak, Athena, and Akrites consumed millions of dollars of engineering time and surfaced thousands of vulnerabilities, only a fraction of which were reported upstream. He argues that finding vulnerabilities was never the bottleneck; patching, asset inventory, and attack surface management remain the true problems. The post also critiques AI hype, agentic workflows, anthropomorphic media coverage, and AI companies' calls for their own regulation.
- AI vulnerability discovery consumed millions in engineering hours and found thousands of flaws.
- Finding vulnerabilities is not the bottleneck; getting packages patched is.
- Better investment would be asset inventory, automated updates, and attack surface enumeration.
- Author criticizes AI companies' self-regulation calls, environmental impact, and agentic workflows.
From the original article
6 min read at netmeister.org
By ibobev · netmeister.org
This source shares headlines only. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.