Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour
VulnerabilitycriticalExploited in the wild

March 2020 Patch Tuesday: Microsoft fixes 115 vulnerabilities, Adobe none

Help Net Securityby @zeljkazorz ()3 min read1 · 1 read
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

Vulnerabilities mentioned

All
CVEVulnerabilityCVSSEPSSSignalsPublished
CVE-2020-0684
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Windows that could allow remote code execution if a .LNK file is processed.An attacker who…
8.89%
CVE-2020-0688
RCE in Microsoft Exchange Server from Shared Install-Time Validation Keys
8.8100%KEVRansomwarePoC ×2
KEV
CVE-2020-0852
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Word software when it fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Microsoft Word Remote Code…
7.812%
CVE-2020-0872
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Application Inspector version v1.0.23 or earlier when the tool reflects example code snippets from third-party…
9.610%
CVE-2020-0905
An remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Dynamics Business Central, aka 'Dynamics Business Central Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'
8.011%
CVE-2020-6812
The first time AirPods are connected to an iPhone, they become named after the user's name by default (e.g
5.32%

From the original article

3 min read at helpnetsecurity.com

It’s March 2020 Patch Tuesday and Microsoft has dropped fixes for 115 CVE-numbered flaws: 26 are critical, 88 important, and one of moderate severity. The good news is that none of them under active attack. For the time being, Adobe seems to be skipping this Patch Tuesday and there’s no indication whether the customary security updates are just delayed or there won’t be any at all in the coming days.

Help Net Security

By @zeljkazorz · helpnetsecurity.com

Read the full article at Help Net Security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.