Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour
Data breachcritical

Nitori says attacker may have stolen 37.62 million customer records

Original title: Japanese furniture giant Nitori says hackers stole 37.6M customer records

BleepingComputerby Bill Toulas ()2 min read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Access may date to mid-October; passwords and card data were not exposed, the retailer says.

Japanese furniture retailer Nitori said an attacker accessed a company system and may have taken up to 37.62 million customer records. The intrusion was found on November 6, 2026, and access was blocked, though the attacker likely had access since mid-October. Exposed data may include names, contact details, dates of birth and order information. Passwords and credit card data were not exposed. Nitori notified Japan’s privacy commission and police.

Unconfirmed: Nitori says the records may have been leaked; external theft is not fully confirmed.

Key facts
  • The incident covers individual customers, corporate members and some non-members.
  • Nitori operates 879 stores in Japan and 219 stores in other markets.
  • The company warned stolen data could be used in phishing and scams.
  • Nitori said it will never request passwords, card numbers or PINs by email or phone.
  • Affected customers will be notified by email or post.
Security assessment · AI, from the article

Impact: Up to 37.62 million customer personal and order records may have leaked

What to do
  1. 1.Treat unexpected requests for passwords, card numbers or PINs as phishing.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

2 min read at bleepingcomputer.com

Nitori, a major Japanese furniture and home accessories retailer, discovered that an attacker accessed a system on its network and may have stolen 37. 62 million customer records. [...]

BleepingComputer

By Bill Toulas · bleepingcomputer.com

Read the full article at BleepingComputer

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.