Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

X.Org libXrender reply overflow allows remote code execution

Original title: ZDI-26-905: X.Org Server libXrender RenderQueryPictFormats Reply Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

ZDI Published Advisories ()
Part of a story covered by 12 sourcesZDI discloses five unpatched Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt remote code execution bugsMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Exploitation needs a connection to a malicious X11 server; ZDI rates CVE-2026-88807 at CVSS 8.8.

ZDI published ZDI-26-905, a heap-based buffer overflow in the libXrender RenderQueryPictFormats reply path of X.Org Server. Remote attackers can run arbitrary code if the target connects to a malicious X11 server. ZDI assigned CVE-2026-88807 and a CVSS score of 8.8. No fixed version or known exploitation is stated.

Key facts
  • Tracked as ZDI-26-905 and CVE-2026-88807.
  • The flaw is in the RenderQueryPictFormats reply handling.
  • The target must connect to a malicious X11 server.
  • ZDI assigned a CVSS rating of 8.8.
Security assessment · AI, from the article

Impact: Remote arbitrary code execution after connecting to a malicious X11 server

ProductAffected
X.Org Server libXrender—
What to do
  1. 1.Do not connect X clients to untrusted X11 servers.
Analyze CVE-2026-88807 with Vani AIImpact, affected versions, exploitation, mitigations and detection

Vulnerabilities mentioned

All
CVEVulnerabilityCVSSEPSSSignalsPublished
CVE-2026-88807
Heap Overflow in libXrender via Malicious X Server
8.9—

From the original article

This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of X. Org Server. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must connect to a malicious X11 server.

ZDI Published Advisories

zerodayinitiative.com

Read the full article at ZDI Published Advisories

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.