Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Dark Storm Team sells DDoS, dumps and stolen access on Telegram

Original title: Dark Storm Team Offers DDoS Attacks, Database Dumps, and Stolen Access Through Telegram Channels

GBHackersby Mayura Kathir ()3 min read
Part of a story covered by 2 sourcesDark Storm Team advertises Telegram DDoS-for-hire; claims unverifiedMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

StealthMole says the advertised prices and extortion claims are not verified transactions or proven outages.

A StealthMole investigation describes Dark Storm Team using Telegram to advertise DDoS attacks, database dumps, compromised accounts and surveillance access alongside hacktivist claims. First observed in late 2023, the group claimed the March 2025 outage of X, which X did not confirm. Ads listed three-hour DDoS attacks for $20 and database dumps from $50 to $300. An alleged $5,000 cryptocurrency demand against Amino is not shown to have been paid. Telegram bans have not stopped the brand.

Unconfirmed: Attack, access and identity claims remain uncorroborated, and X did not confirm Dark Storm's involvement.

Key facts
  • One sales account kept Telegram user ID 8797265807 through 2026 name changes.
  • A one-month DDoS service was advertised at $600; account access started at $250.
  • GLITCH is described as the owner persona, not a confirmed real-world identity.
  • Team1914 shared replacement links after a September 2026 ban.
  • Check-Host reports do not independently prove DDoS causation or data theft.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

3 min read at gbhackers.com

Dark Storm Team uses Telegram as both a hacktivist broadcasting network and a cybercrime storefront, advertising distributed denial-of-service attacks, database dumps, compromised accounts, and surveillance access.

GBHackers

By Mayura Kathir · gbhackers.com

Read the full article at GBHackers

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.