Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Discord bot reviews show privacy worries that star ratings hide

Original title: Measuring Users' Security and Privacy Concerns About Third-Party Community Bots on Discord

arXiv cs.CRby Kofi Ampomah ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Of 183,142 reviews, 8,832 were security and privacy relevant; confession bots exceeded a 50 percent yield.

Researchers analyzed 23,102 third-party Discord bots and reviews from 2021 to 2026. A fine-tuned DeBERTa classifier, then manually checked, kept 8,832 security and privacy reviews, a 4.82 percent pipeline yield. Data Sharing and Data Collection dominated, while permission count and administrator status correlated weakly. They also built BotLens, a Model Context Protocol server with six auditing tools.

Key facts
  • Reviews spanned 49 detected languages.
  • Data Sharing was 30.5 percent and Data Collection 16.2 percent of those reviews.
  • Confession and anonymity bots had pipeline yields above 50 percent.
  • BotLens supports bot checkups, server comparison, and AI-agent integration.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Third-party community-based bots are central to how social platforms such as Discord work. They moderate content, manage roles, play music, and support AI-assisted conversations across millions of servers.

arXiv cs.CR

By Kofi Ampomah · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.