Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

SpliTEE: Improving LLM Inference on Trusted Hardware with Differentially Private GPU Outsourcing

arXiv cs.CRby Shashie Dilhara Batan Arachchige ()1 min read4 · 4 reads
AI summary · glm-5.3Summaries by Vani AI

SpliTEE splits LLM inference between Intel TDX trusted execution and untrusted GPUs, using differential privacy instead of encryption to protect intermediate representations.

SpliTEE extends split inference to LLMs, running inference partly inside an Intel TDX TEE while masking intermediate inputs sent to untrusted GPUs with differential privacy rather than encryption. The authors show a prompt-reconstruction attack recovers nearly 80% of prompts from unmasked intermediate representations, motivating the masking. A global sensitivity analysis bounds the required DP noise scale, avoiding quantization and keeping models in floating point. The implementation is nearly twice as fast as full CPU-based TDX inference and 5-15 seconds faster than encryption-based Slalom with higher accuracy, evaluated on Llama-3.2-3B and Qwen3-4B.

Key facts
  • Prompt-reconstruction attack recovers ~80% of prompts from unmasked intermediate representations
  • Differential privacy replaces encryption, avoiding quantization and keeping floating-point inference
  • Nearly 2x faster than CPU-only TDX; 5-15s faster than Slalom with higher accuracy
  • Evaluated with Intel TDX on Llama-3.2-3B and Qwen3-4B
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

User prompts provided to large language models (LLMs) may contain sensitive or private information that can be misused by remotely deployed models, such as through inadvertent memorization during retraining.

arXiv cs.CR

By Shashie Dilhara Batan Arachchige · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.