Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Who gets to define the rules for AI?

Hacker News · AIby throwworhtthrow ()14 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3Summaries by Vani AI

Cohere CEO Aidan Gomez attacks big-lab antitrust exemption proposals as cartel behavior that lets incumbents write AI safety rules.

Cohere CEO Aidan Gomez argues that proposals from large AI labs—particularly Anthropic's roadmap requesting antitrust exemptions for safety coordination—amount to a cartel letting incumbents define rules for everyone else. He draws parallels to the 1975 SEC NRSRO credit-rating designations and the EU's 1985 Motor Vehicle Block Exemption, where safety justifications produced incumbent-protecting market structures. Gomez supports independent review of highly capable AI systems but disputes who writes the standards, who conducts review, and who participates. He also warns AI cyber offense is getting cheaper faster than defenses are improving.

Key facts
  • Gomez calls big labs' antitrust exemption requests a cartel under safety pretexts.
  • Cites 1975 NRSRO designations and 1985 EU motor vehicle exemption as cautionary precedents.
  • Supports independent review of capable AI systems but disputes who writes standards.
  • Warns AI cyber offense is outpacing defenses, raising infrastructure and security risks.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

14 min read at cohere.com

Artificial intelligence is remaking the world we live in. Within a generation, the way we discover medicine, manage power grids, and secure our national infrastructure will be completely transformed. Many people already realize this and are working to build that future responsibly.

Hacker News · AI

By throwworhtthrow · cohere.com

Read the full article at Hacker News · AI

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.