Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

DHS employee archive Icepick returns after registrar takedown

Original title: Leaked DHS employee archive, Icepick, faces challenges to stay online

CyberScoopby Tim Starks ()3 min read1
Part of a story covered by 15 sourcesMassive leak exposes 41,000 DHS workers and undercover ICE agentsMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

A search tool for records on more than 41,000 employees went dark, then reappeared Thursday under a new registrar.

Hacktivists said they obtained a Department of Homeland Security database on more than 41,000 employees and published a search tool called Icepick. DHS contractor ZeroFox asked host FlokiNET to remove it; FlokiNET refused, but registrar CentralNic placed icepi.cx on serverHold. The site later returned under a different registrar. DHS said it is addressing a potential breach and protecting employees. Bluesky blocked links because the archive shared contact information without permission.

Unconfirmed: DHS called it a potential breach and has not confirmed which records were taken.

Key facts
  • FlokiNET said ZeroFox wrongly labeled the archive a doxxing campaign.
  • ZeroFox said the stolen data identifies and locates real people.
  • CentralNic and ZeroFox did not comment on Thursday.
  • Bluesky said wording changes were coming after it blocked the links.
Security assessment · AI, from the article

Impact: Work identities and contact details for over 41,000 DHS employees

Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

3 min read at cyberscoop.com

A DHS contractor requested its removal, while a social media site blocked links to it. It was offline for a spell before finding a new home. The post Leaked DHS employee archive, Icepick, faces challenges to stay online appeared first on CyberScoop.

CyberScoop

By Tim Starks · cyberscoop.com

Read the full article at CyberScoop

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.