Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

The Machines Are Calling: Measuring Automated and Synthetic Voices in Unwanted Inbound Calls

arXiv cs.CRby Xingyu Shen ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Voice honeypot measurement finds at least 26.9% of unwanted US inbound calls open with machine voices, 13.1% with fresh synthetic speech.

An interactive voice honeypot using language-model personas on real US numbers recorded 10,987 calls over 66 days, following the FCC's February 2024 ruling that AI-generated voices fall under the TCPA. Of 7,233 greeted calls, 13.8% opened with recordings replayed from other calls and 13.1% with fresh audio labeled synthetic, with replays making up 45% of the detector's flagged rate. Synthetic openings concentrated in lead-generation spam (33.8%) rather than fraud (21.1%), and only 0.44% of calls disclosed automation. Prevalence tracked how long a bait number had circulated, and campaigns outlasted their numbers, with one synthetic voice serving nine campaigns.

Key facts
  • At least 26.9% of unwanted call openings are machine-voiced; 9.9% more are silent connections
  • Replayed recordings make up 45% of the synthetic detector's flagged rate
  • Synthetic openings concentrate in lead generation (33.8%) over fraud (21.1%)
  • Only 0.44% of calls disclose automation
  • Seeding history, not calendar time, explains prevalence trends
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

In February 2024 the U. S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) placed AI-generated voices under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).

arXiv cs.CR

By Xingyu Shen · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.