Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Scalable Composition of Byzantine Agreements under Reorder Attacks

arXiv cs.CRby Jing Chen ()1 min read7 · 7 reads
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Researchers present the first adversary model combining party corruption with channel reordering attacks, establishing tight security thresholds for composed Byzantine agreement protocols.

The paper presents the first adversary model combining party corruption with adversarial channel attacks that reorder messages across multiple Byzantine agreement executions. It proves impossibility results for authenticated BA under parallel composition when n ≤ 3t or n ≤ 2c + 2t + 1, with matching possibility results when n > max{3t, 2c + 2t + 1}. The authors provide general black-box compilers plus erasure-correcting-code variants that achieve constant multiplicative communication overhead for long messages.

Key facts
  • First adversary model combining party corruption with channel reordering attacks for Byzantine agreement.
  • Impossibility at n ≤ 3t or n ≤ 2c + 2t + 1, with matching possibility bounds shown tight.
  • Black-box compilers secure single-instance BA protocols under parallel and concurrent composition without extra assumptions.
  • Erasure-correcting-code variants reduce communication to constant multiplicative overhead for long messages.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Byzantine agreement (BA) is a foundational building block in distributed systems, and the security analysis of BA protocols under multi-instance executions has attracted increasing attention. However, most existing adversary models focus solely on party corruption and neglect important threats posed by adversarial manipulations of communication channels in the network.

arXiv cs.CR

By Jing Chen · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.