Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Uncertainty and Explainability in Deep Rough Volatility: A Neural Information-Theoretic Posterior Approach

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Damiano Brigo ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Neural posterior inference calibrates rough Heston models and uses Hellinger-SHAP to explain implied-volatility information gain.

The paper presents simulation-based inference for rough Heston calibration, learning parameter posteriors from an implied-volatility surface with neural ratio estimation. Posterior samples pass through heteroscedastic neural surrogate pricers for path-dependent exotic options, combining parameter and surrogate uncertainty. Hellinger-SHAP attributes posterior information gain to maturity-moneyness regions rather than a single point estimate. In simulation, posterior-predictive intervals covered forward-start, barrier, and realized-variance claims more reliably than point plug-in prices.

Key facts
  • Neural ratio estimation learns rough Heston posteriors from an IV surface.
  • Hellinger-SHAP locates maturity-moneyness regions that inform each parameter.
  • Predictive intervals cover exotic claims better than point plug-in prices.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Deep learning has substantially accelerated the calibration of complex stochastic-volatility models, but neural point calibration alone does not capture the uncertainty remaining after an implied-volatility (IV) surface has been observed. We develop a simulation-based inference framework for rough Heston (rHeston) calibration that learns the posterior distribution of the model parameters conditional on an IV surface.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Damiano Brigo · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.