Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Secret Sharing from Non-Extractable Randomness

arXiv cs.CRby Divesh Aggarwal ()1 min read5 · 4 reads
AI summary · grok-4.7-buildSummaries by Vani AI

Researchers show two-of-two secret sharing of long secrets does not need extractable randomness.

The paper answers a question left open by Bosley and Dodis (TCC 2007): unlike information-theoretic encryption of long messages, two-out-of-two secret sharing of a long secret does not require extractable randomness. For every b at least 2, the authors build flat sources on b+2 bits, each with min-entropy at least b, and a perfectly correct and private scheme that shares a b-bit secret into two (b+1)-bit shares. Every deterministic map to one bit stays at least statistical distance 1/6 from uniform on some source. The construction extends to two-out-of-n and r-out-of-r sharing with stated extraction-error bounds.

Key facts
  • Negative answer to the TCC 2007 question on two-of-two secret sharing.
  • Flat sources of min-entropy at least b share a b-bit secret into two b+1-bit shares.
  • No deterministic one-bit extractor is closer than statistical distance 1/6 to uniform.
  • Similar perfect schemes are given for two-of-n and r-of-r sharing.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Bosley and Dodis (TCC 2007) proved that a class of imperfect randomness sources that suffices for information-theoretic encryption of messages longer than the logarithm of the key length must admit deterministic extraction of nearly uniform bits, and asked whether the same is true of two-out-of-two secret sharing.

arXiv cs.CR

By Divesh Aggarwal · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.