Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

MCP Tool Poisoning Enables Attacker Tool Calls in Agentic AI

Original title: MCP Tool Poisoning in Agentic AI Frameworks: A Cross-Framework Measurement Study

arXiv cs.CRby Farooq Shaikh ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Research finds 22.9% attack success rate with 2,113 vulnerable cells across 12 frameworks and 45 scenarios.

The Model Context Protocol injects attacker-controlled content into agentic AI frameworks without validation. A cross-framework study creates a 25-class taxonomy and runs 9,720 cells with a dual oracle for tool calls and exfiltration. Nine core frameworks show 23-26% susceptibility and implement no intentional defenses.

Key facts
  • Overall attack success rate 22.9% (2,113 vulnerable cells)
  • 64.9% dispatch an attacker tool call
  • Model ASR ranges 0.4% to 49.7%
  • Claude Opus 4.8 vulnerable in 8/530 cells
  • No framework implements intentional defense
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

The Model Context Protocol (MCP) lets agentic AI frameworks connect language models to external tool providers, but it carries attacker-controlled content (tool descriptions, schema fields, and response data) into model context without validation. Prior benchmarks measure model compliance with poisoned instructions without confirming real execution.

arXiv cs.CR

By Farooq Shaikh · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.