Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

ActionGuard: Tool Call Authorization under Poisoned Skills

arXiv cs.CRby Jihun Han ()1 min read2 · 2 reads
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

ActionGuard authorizes LLM agent tool calls before execution, cutting skill-injection success versus prior safeguards.

Researchers present ActionGuard, which inspects skill-influenced LLM-agent tool calls immediately before execution. The reviewer does not see potentially poisoned skill text and instead judges each action using the trusted user request, a balanced skill profile, recent calls, and local scripts. On 139 contextual and 180 obvious injections, it cut attack success 35.54 to 46.11 percent versus Dynamic Guardian and SkillGuard, and 70.44 percent versus no safeguard, while benign task completion stayed high. Decisions are enforced fail-closed at OpenClaw's before-tool-call stage.

Key facts
  • Separates the agent's planning context from the reviewer's authorization context
  • Reviewer never receives the raw, potentially poisoned skill text
  • Tested on 139 contextual and 180 obvious skill injections
  • Attack success fell 70.44 percent versus having no safeguard
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

LLM-based agents extend their capabilities through third-party skills that provide task-specific instructions, scripts, and tool-use procedures. However, malicious instructions inserted into an otherwise benign skill can cause a benign user request to trigger dangerous Tool Calls, including data exfiltration, file deletion, or unauthorized code execution.

arXiv cs.CR

By Jihun Han · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.