Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Learning Collective Dynamics with Differentiable Gaussian Representations

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Jianxiang Ma ()1 min read2
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Researchers propose Differentiable Gaussian Dynamics to learn population behavior from aggregate counts, beating a DeepAR baseline.

The paper introduces Differentiable Gaussian Dynamics, which represents heterogeneous response propensities with a Gaussian mixture, aggregates contact intensity and behavior probabilities differentiably, and updates later responses through feedback recurrence. On windows from KuaiRand-Pure and Online Retail II, it reports lower joint behavioral negative log-likelihood than a DeepAR adaptation with a joint-behavior head. In Retail 2010, one-day behavioral-count MAE is 4.71 versus 6.88. Learning the distribution reduces behavioral NLL by 10.82% versus a fixed Gaussian on one KuaiRand window, and removing feedback raises joint KL from 0.0340 to 0.2577.

Key facts
  • DGD learns population response distributions from aggregate counts.
  • Retail 2010 one-day count MAE is 4.71 versus 6.88 for DeepAR.
  • Learned distribution cuts behavioral NLL 10.82% versus a fixed Gaussian.
  • Removing feedback raises joint KL from 0.0340 to 0.2577.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Collective responses depend on individual differences, contact opportunities, and accumulated experience. Learning their dynamics from aggregate counts requires connecting a population's response distribution to both current observations and future behavior.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Jianxiang Ma · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.