Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Learning joint probabilistic weather forecasts from station observations alone

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Chaeyeon Yi ()1 min read2 · 1 read
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

CLARA learns joint probabilistic surface-weather forecasts from station observations without numerical weather models.

CLARA (Calibrated Advection-Routing Attention), an approximately 28,000-parameter model, learns joint Gaussian forecasts of five surface weather variables from station observations alone, without numerical weather prediction or reanalysis, and supports CPU training. Across six multi-year folds on 96 stations, its lead-mean energy score is 4.9% lower than a matched learned comparator and 11-65% lower than statistical baselines. Holding marginal variances fixed, removing learned correlations worsens joint negative log-likelihood by 1.0-2.8 nats per station. Retrained in ten regions on six continents, it outperforms persistence in all 60 comparisons and a similarly sized learned model in 57 of 60.

Key facts
  • About 28,000 parameters and trainable on CPU
  • Energy score 4.9% better than a matched learned comparator
  • Removing correlations worsens likelihood by 1.0-2.8 nats
  • Beats persistence in all 60 region-lead comparisons
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Assessing compound weather risks requires forecasts representing dependence between variables. CLARA (Calibrated Advection-Routing Attention) learns joint Gaussian predictive distributions of five surface variables from station observations alone, without numerical weather prediction or reanalysis; the approximately 28,000-parameter model supports CPU training and prediction.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Chaeyeon Yi · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.