ZeroHour
DashboardNewsCVEsExploitsIncidentsAIBriefAnalyticsEntitiesWatchlistIOCsAsk the feedSourcesFeeds & APIKiosk mode

Search: “Epsilon”

2 items in the last 3d

Searchkeywordsmart Sortlatesthotimportancerelevance
DomainAllCyberAIWindow24h3d7d30dAllIn the wildImportant onlyShow duplicates
CategoryAllAI research 1AI safety & security 1
SeverityAllcritical 0high 0medium 0low 0info 2

Epsilon-Nash Equilibria in History-Dependent SA-MDPs

Researchers give the first algorithm for computing epsilon-approximate history-dependent equilibria in state-adversarial Markov decision processes with observation-perturbing adversaries.

The paper studies state-adversarial Markov decision processes (SA-MDPs) where an adversary knowing the true state perturbs observations within state-dependent proximity sets each step. The authors prove universal history-dependent equilibrium policies do not exist and reduce SA-MDPs to a strategically equivalent constrained zero-sum one-sided partially observable stochastic game, enabling the first algorithmic route to epsilon-approximations of initial-state dependent equilibria. The algorithm is validated on small analytically verifiable games and scales to larger benchmarks, including Atari Freeway rollouts with a 12-period-ahead horizon.

arXiv cs.CR · 17h agoAI safety & security

Privacy-enhanced federated learning via asynchronous aggregation and local differential perturbation

Federated learning framework combining dynamic differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, and local DP retains 82.6% accuracy at epsilon 0.1 while cutting communication 21.3%.

The paper proposes a privacy-enhanced federated learning framework integrating Dynamic Differential Privacy, lightweight Homomorphic Encryption, and Local Differential Privacy during training. An asynchronous aggregation strategy with version control supports distributed training in asynchronous environments. On CIFAR-10 and Purchase-100, the method maintains up to 82.6% classification accuracy under stringent privacy constraints (epsilon = 0.1) and reduces communication overhead by 21.3% versus FedAvg.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL · 2d agoAI research