Search: “nuclear”

US and China experts push for shared rules banning AI control over nuclear weapons

Brookings and Fudan experts propose US-China red lines barring autonomous AI nuclear launch, ahead of a planned Trump-Xi meeting on September 24.

Melanie Sisson of the Brookings Institution and Tianjiao Jiang of Fudan University published proposals ahead of the planned September 24 Trump-Xi meeting: no autonomous AI launch of nuclear weapons, no AI attacks on nuclear command systems, human control over AI-driven cyberattacks on strategic infrastructure, a shared definition of 'human control,' and an AI-incident hotline. The recommendations build on the November 2024 Biden-Xi agreement. The NSCAI called for preserving human control in 2021, but binding mechanisms still do not exist, and Johns Hopkins' Carla Freeman doubts hotline efficacy, citing China not answering US calls during the 2023 spy balloon crisis.

The Decoder·09:37 UTC · 4h agoAI policy

What's Scarier Than Agents Taking over Internet? CEO Cartel Trying Take over AI

Opinion essay argues Dario Amodei's proposals for embedded evaluators and frontier AI coordination would require antitrust waivers and entrench a large-lab cartel.

The author critiques Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei's proposal for embedded evaluators inside AI labs, democratic coordination on safety standards and pacing, and global coordination with authoritarian governments. He argues such coordination requires loosening antitrust law, burdening startups while shielding incumbents like Anthropic, OpenAI, and xAI, and doubts verifiable global pacing given enormous defection incentives. The piece links lab motivations to data center subsidy pushback, competition from open-source and low-cost Chinese models, and upcoming IPO financial disclosures.

Hacker News · security·Sep 17, 00:44 UTC · 1d agoAI policyHN 20↑ · 2 comments1

A brief history of AI executives calling for regulation

The Verge chronicles the history of AI executives, from Samuel Butler and Turing-era warnings to Altman and Musk, publicly calling for AI regulation.

The article traces recurring calls for AI regulation, from Samuel Butler's 1863 warnings and Alan Turing's 1951 lecture to Bill Joy's 2000 essay and Microsoft's 2018 facial recognition stance. Modern examples include Elon Musk's 2017 remarks to US governors, the 2023 Future of Life Institute pause letter, and Sam Altman's 2023 Senate testimony. It argues such appeals from industry leaders who profit from AI warrant skepticism.

The Verge · AI·Sep 16, 12:00 UTC · 2d agoAI policy1

Urgently needed: AI governance in cyber warfare

Help Net Security·Jun 13, 00:00 UTC · Jun 13, 2024AI policy

Treasury’s Scott Bessent says no liability exemptions for AI labs

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urged Congress to reject AI labs' requested liability exemptions, arguing creator liability is the best safety guarantee.

Testifying before the House Financial Services Committee, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the government should not grant frontier labs liability waivers, responding to Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei's slowdown essay. He cited Treasury's AI safety work since the release of Anthropic's Mythos model, whose cybersecurity risks prompted an April meeting, and coordination with banks and labs after the July Hugging Face cyberattack. Bessent also highlighted the Gold Eagle clearinghouse run with CISA and called for more US-built open-source models to counter China.

CyberScoop·Sep 16, 14:10 UTC · 1d agoAI policy1

Who gets to define the rules for AI?

Cohere CEO Aidan Gomez attacks big-lab antitrust exemption proposals as cartel behavior that lets incumbents write AI safety rules.

Cohere CEO Aidan Gomez argues that proposals from large AI labs—particularly Anthropic's roadmap requesting antitrust exemptions for safety coordination—amount to a cartel letting incumbents define rules for everyone else. He draws parallels to the 1975 SEC NRSRO credit-rating designations and the EU's 1985 Motor Vehicle Block Exemption, where safety justifications produced incumbent-protecting market structures. Gomez supports independent review of highly capable AI systems but disputes who writes the standards, who conducts review, and who participates. He also warns AI cyber offense is getting cheaper faster than defenses are improving.

Hacker News · AI·Sep 14, 04:49 UTC · 4d agoAI policyHN 41↑ · 29 comments

EU begins enforcing AI Act, putting AI models under the microscope

Help Net Security·Aug 4, 00:00 UTC · Aug 4, 2026AI policy

Comic

404 Media·Jan 21, 14:00 UTC · Jan 21, 2026AI policy