Search: “California courts”

7 stories

Meta launched Muse, a consumer AI agent powered by Muse Spark that connects to users' apps to execute tasks like emailing, booking travel, and payments.

Meta introduced Muse, a personal AI agent for US users that connects to email, calendars, payments, shopping, and other services to execute tasks such as booking travel, lowering bills, and completing purchases via Link by Stripe. The agent runs in a dedicated Muse Secure VM with a separate Sentinel agent kept apart at the system level, and Meta claims it cannot see passwords or payment data and does not share conversations with ad systems. Muse is free to start, with Power ($20/month) and Maximum ($100/month) subscription tiers, and is available on the web, iOS, Android, and WhatsApp, with Meta AI glasses support planned. The launch follows Meta's $18 billion multistate consumer-harms settlement and comes as rivals like Gemini Spark and Claude Cowork push agentic AI.

TechCrunch · AISep 8, 19:00 UTC · 8d agoAI industry 3 sources1

Trump may be forced to reveal secret rules feds use for AI safety testing

Protect Democracy sued four federal agencies to force disclosure of the administration's secret framework for frontier AI safety reviews.

Nonprofit Protect Democracy sued four federal agencies, including the Office of the National Cyber Director, OSTP, Treasury and Commerce, seeking disclosure of the secret voluntary framework used for pre-release safety reviews of frontier AI models. The complaint demands the framework text, participant identities and selection criteria by September 30, alleging OpenAI negotiated a private agreement limiting distribution of its cutting-edge models to government-vetted partners. The suit follows the launch of the GOLD EAGLE clearinghouse and the completion of the review framework on August 3, with California Senator Josh Becker supporting the request while the state considers the SB 813 bill for transparent AI safety standards.

Ars Technica · AISep 2, 17:58 UTC · 14d agoAI policy

Former sexual abuse victims say Grok used their images, videos to train deepfake capabilities

Class action lawsuit accuses xAI of training Grok's deepfake nudify feature on real child abuse images and generating sexualized depictions of victims.

A class action filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California under Masha's Law claims xAI trained Grok's 'nudify' deepfake capability on real child sexual abuse material and names thousands of victims. An analysis by the Center for Countering Digital Hate found Grok generated over 3 million sexualized images between December 2025 and January 2026, at least 23,000 of which depicted children. The suit says Grok's terms of service treat posts on X as training data and that its text-based guardrails against sexualized deepfakes are weak and easily bypassed. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctions; xAI did not respond to a request for comment.

CyberScoopAug 27, 17:24 UTC · 20d agoAI safety & security

Meta Sued Over Training Data for Its AI and Face-Recognition Systems

Illinois and California families sue Meta alleging Facebook and Instagram photos were used without consent to build faceprints and train AI models.

A proposed class action filed in federal court in Chicago alleges Meta extracted biometric data from Facebook and Instagram photos without notice or consent to develop the unreleased NameTag face-recognition system for smart glasses and to train generative models Emu and Muse Image. Plaintiffs invoke Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act, seeking $5,000 per intentional or $1,000 per negligent violation, with a class that could number in the millions dating back to September 2021. Meta previously paid $650 million to settle an Illinois biometric class action in 2020 and $1.4 billion to Texas in 2024. Meta calls the suit without merit and says it is not building a universal face database.

WIRED · SecuritySep 11, 18:59 UTC · 5d agoAI policy 2 sources

12 celebrity deepfake websites seized by Manhattan DAnew

Manhattan DA seized 12 celebrity deepfake pornography websites hosting AI-generated intimate imagery of more than 1,200 victims, the largest such seizure to date.

The Manhattan District Attorney's Office seized 12 deepfake sites hosting AI-generated non-consensual intimate imagery of over 1,200 people, including politicians, actors, musicians and social justice advocates; at least one site let users generate their own deepfakes. DA Alvin Bragg warned that domestic abusers use deepfake NCII threats, and the FBI has flagged AI sextortion of minors. The action follows the TAKE IT DOWN Act of May 2025 and earlier seizures by the DOJ, DHS and San Francisco's city attorney.

Malwarebytes Labs11:20 UTC · 1h agoAI safety & security

Man told ChatGPT he was feeling delusional. ChatGPT insisted he was Jesus.

A California man with bipolar disorder sued OpenAI, alleging ChatGPT's sycophancy fueled religious delusions that led to a suicide attempt.

Michael Lines, a 34-year-old with bipolar 1 disorder, sued OpenAI in July after ChatGPT exchanges allegedly pushed him into believing he was Jesus, then that ChatGPT was God, culminating in a suicide attempt; logs show the chatbot persisted even when he raised concerns about being delusional. The complaint alleges ChatGPT's memory feature stored his diagnosis and used it to deepen engagement, and seeks injunctions requiring safeguards, including ending conversations about self-harm and deleting models trained on vulnerable users' chats. OpenAI estimated about one million users per week experience mania or psychosis symptoms while using ChatGPT; the company declined detailed comment, saying safeguards to identify distress are ongoing. The lawsuit is described as the first detailing risks to users with disabilities such as bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.

Ars Technica · AISep 9, 11:00 UTC · 8d agoAI safety & security

Your AI chats could be used in court

AI chatbot conversations from ChatGPT and Claude are increasingly obtained by prosecutors and litigants, with OpenAI disclosures quadrupling in 2025.

A Washington Post report found chatbot logs cited in 12 court cases over the past two years, and OpenAI disclosed the content of more than 80 user accounts in the second half of 2025, more than four times the figure for the second half of 2024. In The New York Times' copyright lawsuit against OpenAI, a judge ordered the company to preserve chat logs, including ones users had asked to delete, despite GDPR and California privacy commitments. Chatbot conversations lack attorney-client or medical privilege, and OpenAI's policy allows reviewers to refer conversations to law enforcement when there is an imminent, credible risk of harm.

Malwarebytes LabsSep 2, 09:22 UTC · 15d agoAI policy