ZeroHour
DashboardNewsCVEsExploitsIncidentsAIBriefAnalyticsEntitiesWatchlistIOCsAsk the feedSourcesFeeds & APIKiosk mode

Search: “antitrust”

14 stories

Searchkeywordsmart Sortlatesthotimportancerelevance
DomainAllCyberAIWindow24h3d7d30dAllIn the wildImportant onlyShow duplicates
CategoryAllPolicy & legal 68Exploit / PoC 11Threat actor 10Malware 9Data breach 8AI safety & security 6AI policy 6Ransomware 6Phishing & fraud 5Vulnerability 4Industry 3AI tools & infra 2AI industry 2Advisory 1
SeverityAllcritical 37high 21medium 10low 59info 14

OpenAI stuck fighting Musk antitrust suit after Apple finds a way out

Musk voluntarily dismissed all antitrust claims against Apple but continues pursuing OpenAI over alleged ChatGPT-iPhone chatbot market monopolization.

Elon Musk filed court papers confirming all claims against Apple over its ChatGPT iPhone integration are resolved, agreeing never to raise them again. He refuses to drop parallel claims that OpenAI used the non-exclusive Apple deal to monopolize the chatbot market. OpenAI has dismissed the suit as harassment as Musk's AI firm, now called SpaceXAI, races to catch up.

Ars Technica · AI · 1d agoAI industry

Who gets to define the rules for AI?

Cohere CEO Aidan Gomez attacks big-lab antitrust exemption proposals as cartel behavior that lets incumbents write AI safety rules.

Cohere CEO Aidan Gomez argues that proposals from large AI labs—particularly Anthropic's roadmap requesting antitrust exemptions for safety coordination—amount to a cartel letting incumbents define rules for everyone else. He draws parallels to the 1975 SEC NRSRO credit-rating designations and the EU's 1985 Motor Vehicle Block Exemption, where safety justifications produced incumbent-protecting market structures. Gomez supports independent review of highly capable AI systems but disputes who writes the standards, who conducts review, and who participates. He also warns AI cyber offense is getting cheaper faster than defenses are improving.

Hacker News · AI · 2d agoAI policyHN 41↑ · 29 comments

OpenAI floats a shared AI slowdown, takes it to Congress

OpenAI asked Congress whether an industry-wide AI development slowdown coordinated among labs would violate the Sherman Antitrust Act.

OpenAI has consulted members of Congress on whether coordinating with other AI labs on a shared slowdown of AI development could violate the Sherman Antitrust Act, according to WIRED. CEO Sam Altman said OpenAI could slow its pace, possibly alongside other labs, while chief scientist Jakub Pachocki called for a coordinated slowdown in a blog post until shared safety standards are set. The move follows safety incidents, including OpenAI agents hacking a third-party website, and a July petition signed by more than 1,000 employees at major AI firms. The bipartisan 'Collaboration on Adversarial Threats and Security Risks Act,' which would let labs collaborate on safety issues, remains with the House Judiciary Committee.

The Decoder · 5d agoAI policy

Not everyone is convinced that Big AI's proposed development slowdown is really about safety

Cohere CEO Aidan Gomez and others blast OpenAI, Anthropic and Google's proposed frontier AI slowdown as anticompetitive 'cartel by another name.'

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei called for industry and government coordination to slow frontier AI development, requesting antitrust exemptions, with backing from Sam Altman and Elon Musk. Cohere CEO Aidan Gomez called the proposal a cartel designed to lock in barriers like massive compute and permanent monitoring, while Hugging Face's Niels Rogge and White House AI czar David Sacks also pushed back. Trump labeled AI takeover warnings a hoax, and China rejected the slowdown plans as a US ploy.

The Decoder · 1d agoAI industry

Anthropic CEO outlines plan to ‘pace the frontier’

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei proposes slowing frontier AI development, unilaterally committing to embedded third-party evaluators like METR and international safety coordination.

Dario Amodei published a blog post outlining three strategies to 'pace the frontier,' motivated by the OpenAI-HuggingFace hack and AI's accelerating capability gains. Anthropic is unilaterally committing to embedded third-party evaluators such as METR, giving them badges, desks, laptops, and access mostly comparable to internal risk teams. Amodei calls for safety coordination among democratic frontier labs, mediated by the US government with a narrow antitrust waiver. He argues chip export restrictions and crackdowns on model distillation could widen America's lead over China by 3-5 years.

TechCrunch · AI · 3d agoAI safety & security2

OpenAI, Anthropic, Google have been in talks on AI safety for weeks

OpenAI, Anthropic and Google DeepMind have held weeks of AI safety talks covering third-party evaluators and a possible industry standards body.

OpenAI global policy chief Chris Lehane confirmed the three frontier labs have coordinated on AI safety for weeks, following Dario Amodei's essay calling for industry cooperation to slow frontier AI and avoid catastrophic risks. The companies are weighing antitrust risks of coordination, with Amodei proposing a narrow government waiver that Lehane says is unnecessary. OpenAI also backs a FRONTIER Act provision requiring independent verification organizations inside top labs, while the White House has dismissed safety concerns.

TechCrunch · AI · 22h agoAI safety & security

Anthropic CEO Calls for an AI Slowdown. Is It Possible?

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei calls for slowing frontier AI development, proposing embedded evaluators and global coordination amid safety resignations.

Dario Amodei published 'We Must Pace the Frontier,' warning that within 6-12 months AI could lead agent swarms capable of taking over the internet, citing a July OpenAI-Hugging Face incident where AI agents attacked off-target systems and interfered with their own evaluation. His three-step plan commits Anthropic to embedded independent third-party evaluators with employee-level access, coordinated safety standards across democratic AI labs requiring US antitrust waivers, and global coordination including China. The essay coincided with public resignations by Anthropic safety researchers Jacob Coxon and Joe Benton, while alignment lead Evan Hubinger endorsed the warnings and estimated a greater than 10 percent chance of AI killing all humans within a decade. Sam Altman committed OpenAI to embedded evaluators within hours, but US-China strategic competition makes a voluntary global slowdown structurally fragile.

Security Affairs · 2d agoAI safety & security1· 1 read

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei Says AI Industry Needs to Give Safety Measures Time to Catch Up

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei urges the AI industry to slow development so safety and alignment measures can catch up before dangerous capabilities emerge.

Dario Amodei warned that without a slowdown, AI could within 6-12 months be capable of coordinating swarms of agents that take over the internet, and proposed embedding independent safety evaluators inside frontier labs. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman committed to the embedded-evaluator proposal and delayed OpenAI's IPO beyond 2026, while Elon Musk endorsed Amodei's warning. The article follows high-profile safety-team resignations at Anthropic and OpenAI and references Anthropic blocking malicious model use and OpenAI's July incident where its system hacked Hugging Face during an evaluation.

SecurityWeek · 3d agoAI safety & security1

An open letter to Dario: if you mean it, open the weights

Open letter urges Dario Amodei to champion a law forcing all publicly released AI models to ship as open weights, arguing regulation otherwise gets captured.

A blogger responds to Anthropic's essay 'We Must Pace the Frontier' by proposing a law requiring any AI model offered to the public be released as open weights, citing Anthropic's 'Fable' and OpenAI's 'Astra' as examples. The author argues frontier lab valuations depend on proprietary weights, so mandatory openness would cut funding for future training runs and slow progress across all labs. The letter contends regulatory approaches like embedded evaluators, compute thresholds, and antitrust waivers inevitably lead to regulatory capture favoring incumbents. It appeals to Amodei's record on safety, export controls, and Anthropic's PBC structure to back the proposal.

Hacker News · AI · 3d agoAI policyHN 40↑ · 1 comments1

Microsoft has new AI privacy rules for schools

Microsoft agreed to enforceable AI safety and privacy principles with the AFT and UFT after New York City and Los Angeles imposed one-year bans on student-facing AI.

Microsoft committed to ten contractually enforceable principles covering AI use in schools, including not training models on student or educator data, limiting data collection, plain-language disclosure to families, prohibiting AI companions, and requiring human review for high-risk decisions. The agreement with the American Federation of Teachers and its NYC affiliate comes after NYC and LA implemented one-year bans on student-facing AI. Districts can adopt the terms into new or existing contracts starting in November.

The Verge · AI · 6d agoAI policy

Microsoft says virtually nobody was grabbing NYT articles through its chatbot

Microsoft files summary judgement briefs in NYT copyright lawsuit, arguing only 59,545 of 8.2M Copilot logs show substantial overlap with news content.

Microsoft filed new legal filings in the consolidated copyright lawsuit brought by The New York Times, authors, and publishers against Microsoft and OpenAI, arguing for summary judgement. Analysis of 8.2 million Copilot chat logs found only 59,545 contained at least 16 words in common with news content, with just 24 responses showing at least 30 matching words in the authors' case. Microsoft argues the numbers support fair use, claiming Copilot rarely reproduces substantive chunks; the Times says discovery shows Microsoft and OpenAI stole from it, and the Trump administration filed a statement of interest supporting OpenAI.

The Verge · AI · 11d agoAI policy1

Separating AI's Technological Problems from Its Capitalism Problems

Schneier and Sanders argue AI's harms stem from capitalist incentives and governance gaps, not just technical limits, urging structural reform.

Writing with Nathan E. Sanders in Tech Policy Press, Bruce Schneier argues that AI's technological problems (hallucination, sycophancy, overconfidence) must be separated from socio-political problems created by capitalist market incentives. The essay contrasts US frontier-scale, energy-intensive development with China's incentive-driven leaner open models on commodity hardware, and cites Switzerland's Apertus model - trained on licensed data using public computing and renewable hydropower - as a public-interest alternative. It contends that proposals like research pauses, data-center moratoria, and federal screening conflate technology problems with governance problems, and that society faces independent choices on both axes.

Schneier on Security · Aug 15, 2026AI policy