Microsoft's MAI-DxO beats generalists on complex NEJM cases
First merged summary.
Microsoft's MAI-DxO scored 83% on complex NEJM cases versus 36% for generalist physicians in a Science study.
Microsoft unveiled MAI-DxO, also called Diagnostic Orchestrator, which uses multiple agents to gather history, order tests, and reach diagnoses. In a Science study of complex New England Journal of Medicine cases, it was correct 83% of the time versus 36% for primary care doctors and general internists working alone with references; The Verge also reports 22% without references, and TechCrunch says specialists were not compared. The strongest runs used OpenAI's GPT-5 and GPT-5.5, with smaller DxO gains on stronger models. The Verge reports 80% versus 47% for doctors on Beth Israel Deaconess emergency data and lower estimated costs, while TechCrunch says emergency cases showed little DxO gain over GPT-5 or GPT-5.5. Mustafa Suleyman said Microsoft is training a healthcare foundation model with Mayo Clinic for next year and will evaluate DxO with Beth Israel Deaconess.
- MAI-DxO scored 83% on complex NEJM cases versus 36% for referenced generalists.
- TechCrunch says specialists were not included in that physician comparison.
- GPT-5 alone scored 78.9% at about $8,400 per case.
- DxO cut that cost by about $3,000 and raised accuracy by about four points.
- With GPT-5.5, DxO lifted accuracy from 72% to nearly 87%.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash rose from 46.4% alone to nearly 69% with DxO.
What each outlet adds
beyond the shared facts- The VergeReports 22% without references, ED 80% versus 47%, and an SDBench open-source plan.
- TechCrunchAdds model costs, GPT-5.5 and Gemini gains, and the Mayo Clinic plan.
- Vendors
- Microsoft
- Products
- Diagnostic Orchestrator
- AI models
- MAI-DxOGPT-5GPT-5.5Gemini 2.5 Flash
Coverage
oldest first · one row per article · UTCMicrosoft AI tool outperforms doctors in medical diagnosis
Diagnostic Orchestrator AI achieves 83% accuracy on case reports versus 36% for physicians, using multiple reasoning agents.
Microsoft says MAI-DxO beat generalist doctors on hard cases
In a simulation of complex NEJM cases, MAI-DxO was correct 83% of the time versus 36% for generalists.