Local Open-Weight LLM Agents Solve CyberGym Tasks with Best-of-N Sampling
First merged summary.
Local open-weight LLM agents solve most of six easier CyberGym tasks down to 4B size, with turn-level best-of-N sampling yielding 5-10% accuracy gains on long-horizon tasks.
Twelve configurations of local models spanning three generations, two architectures, and three quantization levels were evaluated on ten CyberGym tasks for vulnerability-reproduction. Every configuration solves most of the six easier tasks. For harder tasks the 27B model is required. Turn-level best-of-N sampling with generator-selector LLMs yields 5-10% accuracy gains and improved consistency on long-horizon tasks. Agent trajectories often name the vulnerable function and correct hypothesis.
- Configurations down to 4B solve most of six easier CyberGym tasks
- 27B model required for harder tasks
- Turn-level best-of-N sampling provides 5-10% accuracy improvement
- Improved consistency across repeated attempts
- Quantization affects speed but not solved tasks
- Agent trajectories name vulnerable function
What each outlet adds
beyond the shared facts- arXiv cs.CRAnalysis of local open-weight LLM agents on vulnerability-reproduction tasks with CyberGym benchmark
- arXiv cs.AITurn-level best-of-N sampling for improved accuracy and consistency in LLM agents
- AI models
- LLMs
Coverage
oldest first · one row per article · UTCLocal Open-Weight LLMs Solve Most Vulnerability Reproduction Tasks
All tested configurations solve most of six easier CyberGym tasks down to 4B size with 27B required for the rest.
Turn-level best-of-N sampling improves LLM agent accuracy by 5-10%
Turn-level best-of-N sampling with generator-selector LLMs yields 5-10% accuracy gains and improved consistency on long-horizon tasks by selecting optimal actions at each step.