Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour
RansomwarehighExploited in the wild

Berlin investigates new data leak after hackers publish stolen login credentials

The Record ()3 min read3
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Berlin investigates a fresh leak after Rhysida hackers published stolen login credentials; the city refuses to pay the ransom demand.

Berlin confirmed hackers published additional stolen data, including login credentials, from a mid-August cyberattack on two city ministries responsible for urban development/housing and transport/climate. The Rhysida ransomware group claimed the breach in late August, saying it stole 5.79 TB of data including contracts, emails, passwords and classified information; Berlin acknowledged an extortion demand but refused to pay. Berlin's data protection regulator said the leak includes personal data on public employees and possibly residents, such as names, addresses, dates of birth and bank information. Germany's BSI separately linked the campaign to the TerminalFix fake-CAPTCHA technique and the LoremIpsumLoader/AxolotLoader malware tied to financially motivated Rhysida-associated hackers, days before Berlin's Sept. 20 election.

Key facts
  • Rhysida claims 5.79 TB stolen; city officials say Berlin will not be blackmailed.
  • BSI ties the campaign to fake-CAPTCHA 'TerminalFix' attacks and LoremIpsumLoader malware.
  • Affected systems were isolated from Berlin's government network on Aug. 14.
  • Officials say no evidence the city's Sept. 20 election systems were affected.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

3 min read at therecord.media

Another trove of data from Berlin's government has appeared online, authorities said. Germany's information security agency separately warned about the Rhysida cybercrime group.

The Record

therecord.media

Read the full article at The Record

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.