Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Not Every Token Is Worth Distilling: Selective Supervision for Direct-OPD

Hugging Face daily papersby Yibo Zhao, Zixuan Yang, Yunshi Lan ()1 min read2 · 1 read
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Selective Direct-OPD keeps the top 10% of high-divergence states and beats dense distillation on math benchmarks.

The paper shows Direct On-Policy Distillation can assign unchanged token-level rewards even when Jensen-Shannon and KL divergence between pre-RL and post-RL teacher checkpoints vanish. S^2D-OPD ranks student-sampled states by teacher-reference JSD and applies Direct-OPD supervision only to the top 10% of states per response. Across two teacher pairs and four students from 1.7B to 8B parameters, it beat dense Direct-OPD on AIME and HMMT in seven of eight settings and matched it in the eighth, without extra forward passes.

Key facts
  • Direct-OPD reward can stay fixed while checkpoint divergence vanishes.
  • S^2D-OPD masks low-JSD states and keeps the top 10% per response.
  • Gains held on AIME and HMMT in seven of eight student settings, from 1.7B to 8B.
  • No extra teacher forward passes are required.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at huggingface.co

Direct On-Policy Distillation (Direct-OPD) transfers reinforcement-learning-induced policy improvements from a small model to a larger student by using the token-level log-ratio between post-RL and pre-RL checkpoints as dense supervision on the student's own rollouts.

Hugging Face daily papers

By Yibo Zhao, Zixuan Yang, Yunshi Lan · huggingface.co

Read the full article at Hugging Face daily papers

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.