Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Latent-MoE: Domain-Aware Mixture-of-Experts for PDEs with Multi-Regime Physics

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Hanwen Wang ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Latent-MoE adds domain-aware mixture-of-experts routing to PINNs, improving accuracy over an order of magnitude on multi-regime physics PDEs.

The paper shows standard coordinate networks used in physics-informed neural networks have translation-variant NTKs causing long-range gradient conflicts on PDEs with spatially varying physics. MoE architectures with centered compact-support routers produce a uniformly banded NTK that localizes learning. Latent-MoE interleaves domain-aware MoE blocks in a shared backbone, outperforming FB-PINNs and X-PINNs by over an order of magnitude on multi-stage time-variable physics benchmarks.

Key facts
  • NTK analysis explains PINN failure on multi-regime PDEs
  • Compact-support routers yield exponentially decaying kernel-regression weights
  • Latent-MoE allows capacity sharing across regions via shared backbone
  • Improves over an order of magnitude versus global and rigid-decomposition baselines
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) struggle on PDEs whose governing physics varies across the domain. We trace this to a structural property of standard coordinate networks: their neural tangent kernel (NTK) is translation-variant and lets training points of large coordinate magnitude disproportionately influence predictions elsewhere, producing long-range coupling and gradient conflict during training.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Hanwen Wang · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.