
NaiveAI ships open-weights Naive-N0.5-Flash for fast coding
A small Latent Space test saw high server-side throughput and very long hard-question traces, without grading accuracy.
132 stories, newest first · one card per story

A small Latent Space test saw high server-side throughput and very long hard-question traces, without grading accuracy.
On four dense and MoE workloads, the authors report up to 2.75x speedup and mean MFU rising from 17.4% to 30.0%.
The guide covers seven production MoE routing methods used in models like Mixtral and DeepSeek-V4, highlighting sigmoid gating and bias balancing as dominant approaches.
Inkling 2 Small scores 31 on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 18 points above predecessor, at higher cost.
At matched token budgets it lowered loss in 11 of 12 runs and raised average accuracy in 10 of 12.

FlashProve cryptographic proofs confirm specific models generated specific replies, tested on Llama 4 Maverick MoE model.
The paper reports roughly log-linear PSNR gains and a 50-category CDD-50 benchmark.
The training-free method cuts about 27 GB of BF16 expert weights so an about 58 GB model fits a 40 GB GPU.
Manager-Worker architecture with hard routing outperforms standalone models and Time-MoE on five context-rich datasets.
On a 16B MoE model the authors report +7.0 points on MMLU-Pro while cutting KV cache by about one third.
On Samaya’s own benchmark it scores 58.9% at $0.61 per question versus 55.9% and $6.89 for Claude Fable 5.1.
Self-reported full steps on Qwen3 MoE models were 32% to 34% faster than prime-rl and up to 55% faster than TorchTitan.
On a 24-layer 10B-A1B model trained on 708B tokens, nine-task mean rose 1.18 points.
On Turing-20B-A2B the method scores 0.9988 across four domains and beats Qwen3-8B on math and code.

The open model transcribes 40 languages while activating about 4 billion of its 30 billion parameters.
On 128 billion-token MoE pretraining, AIR lowers terminal training loss by about 0.01 versus cosine at matched cumulative learning rate.
Across 24 matched comparisons, HotPOT cuts rollout error 50.7% on average versus MoE-POT, including a 17M model.
On dense models it reports about 15% token-equivalent speedup versus MuonH at matched validation loss.
Muon raises router bias span in early MoE layers, complicating load balancing at tuned learning rates.
A weight-only reader keeps 98.1% of full accuracy at 17.8% of routed-expert reads and speeds MoE blocks versus vLLM.

The 2.8T mixture-of-experts model, with 104B active parameters, scored 55 on Artificial Analysis; the API is live but weights are not.
The text-only model uses about 3B active parameters per token and a 128K context window.
The title lists 2.8T total parameters, 104B active parameters, and a 1 million-token context.
Of 44 configurations, 42 used more energy per problem, with overheads from 4% to 886%.
Today 1.5K readers · 2.4K views · 754 reads · all time 189K views