Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

WhatsApp help pages exposed hidden instructions for a Meta chatbot

Original title: WhatsApp Help Pages Leaked Hidden Instructions for a Meta Chatbot

WIRED · Securityby Matt Burgess ()3 min read1 · 1 read
Part of a story covered by 4 sourcesWhatsApp hid chatbot orders not to name privacy regulatorsMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

About 80 FAQ pages held roughly 100 hidden blocks telling a support model what not to say, including legal topics.

Redact found system-style instructions for a Meta large language model in the source of about 80 WhatsApp help and FAQ pages. The hidden text, under the heading HelpContentGalaxyLLMInclude, steered the bot away from legal advice, liability statements, and unreleased features. WIRED reviewed archived copies. After being contacted, Meta removed the text and said a bug had displayed chatbot instructions that were not meant for users.

Unconfirmed: How long the text was public, and whether third-party chatbots could use it, is not known.

Key facts
  • One block said not to recommend contacting a data protection or supervisory authority.
  • Legal-action prompts told the model not to cite terms, privacy policy, or GDPR, LGPD, or CCPA.
  • WhatsApp said the bug is fixed and the text is gone from live page code.
  • It is unclear how long the text was visible or whether other chatbots could read it.
Security assessment · AI, from the article

Impact: Internal chatbot steering instructions exposed in page source

ProductAffected
Meta WhatsApp help pages—
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

3 min read at wired.com

Around 80 pages on WhatsApp’s website exposed instructions that were designed for its chatbot, including “WHAT NOT TO SAY.” Meta says a bug caused the issue.

WIRED · Security

By Matt Burgess · wired.com

Read the full article at WIRED · Security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.