Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Memory-chasing attack fingerprints websites via DRAM traffic

Original title: Robust & Scalable Website Fingerprinting via Minimal DRAM Traffic

arXiv cs.CRby Shubham Roy ()1 min read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Memory-chasing counts DRAM accesses to achieve 96% accuracy on 24-core systems.

Website fingerprinting attacks infer visited websites using shared system resources. Existing co-located attacks suffer performance degradation on many-core systems. Memory-chasing exploits DRAM traffic interference through pointer-chasing traversals. It achieves 96% accuracy on the top 50 websites on a 24-core system, 86% across multiple CCDs, and 80% across multiple sockets. The attack is robust across hardware configurations, browsers, operating systems, and countermeasures.

Key facts
  • 96% accuracy on 24-core system for top 50 websites
  • 86% accuracy across multiple CCDs
  • 80% accuracy across multiple sockets
  • 97% in open-world setting
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Website fingerprinting attacks infer websites visited by users and threaten their privacy. These attacks are classified as on-path, which monitor network traffic, and co-located, which exploit shared system resources. Existing co-located attacks, such as sweep-counting and loop-counting, achieve over 90% accuracy but suffer significant performance degradation on many-core systems.

arXiv cs.CR

By Shubham Roy · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.