Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Paper gives probabilistic semantics for Rowhammer-style bit flips

Original title: A Rowhammer attack on Fil-C's software capabilities

arXiv cs.CRby Amir Naseredini ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

A collapse theorem says physical separation makes protected executions match the fault-free run for every finite prefix.

The paper presents probabilistic small-step semantics for an idealized imperative language under Rowhammer-style faults, abstracting away DRAM physics. A general fault model assigns bit-flip probabilities during reads or writes in a specified victim region. Physical separation is formalized as a case study, and a distribution-independent theorem equates the protected projection with the Dirac distribution of the Rowhammer-free execution for every finite prefix. The work also develops an observation-parametric account of secure information flow.

Unconfirmed: The title names an attack on Fil-C, but the abstract only presents formal semantics and a physical-separation proof.

Key facts
  • The semantics abstracts from DRAM internals and semiconductor physics.
  • Faults are probabilities of bit flips during reads or writes in a victim region.
  • The theorem covers prefixes of terminating and non-terminating executions.
  • The title names Fil-C, but the abstract does not describe that attack.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Rowhammer is a hardware vulnerability in dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) in which repeated accesses to one or more aggressor rows can induce bit-flips in nearby victim rows. This phenomenon violates a core assumption of conventional programming language semantics: that reading from or writing to one memory location does not modify others.

arXiv cs.CR

By Amir Naseredini · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.