Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Multi-chain coupling shrinks safe EIP-1559 fee update rates

Original title: On the (In)stability of Adaptive Fee Mechanisms in Multi-Chain Systems

arXiv cs.CRby Yifan Zhou ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Cross-chain delay cuts the safe base-fee update space by up to 84.8% and can destabilize otherwise stable peer chains.

A paper models multi-chain transaction fee markets as a nonlinear system with delayed feedback and identifies delay-amplified over-correction as the source of instability. Experiments find cross-chain coupling erodes stability relative to a single chain. At Ethereum's update rate, the multi-chain system oscillates between full and near-empty blocks. The authors say mainstream Cosmos chains already exceed safe bounds under default settings and propose a protocol-level mitigation.

Unconfirmed: Stability losses and the 84.8% reduction are experimental results from the authors' model, not observed mainnet incidents.

Key facts
  • Polkadot uses conservative update rates that effectively disable fee adaptivity.
  • Cosmos uses aggressive update rates without formal stability guarantees.
  • Over half of blocks are at full capacity in the multi-chain Ethereum-rate case.
  • Load oscillation raises Cosmos block failure rates by an order of magnitude, the authors report.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

EIP-1559 has become the dominant transaction fee mechanism in permissionless blockchains, regulating scarce block space through an adaptive base fee. The design balances a trade-off between responsiveness to demand fluctuations and stability of long-term resource usage. On a single chain, this trade-off is well understood and empirically stable.

arXiv cs.CR

By Yifan Zhou · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.