Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Qpid Proton C through 0.40.0 can overflow on bad TLS wildcards

Original title: CVE-2026-115942: Apache Qpid Proton C: Verifying non compliant TLS wildcard cert can cause stack buffer overflow read

oss-security ()1
Part of a story covered by 4 sourcesApache discloses four Qpid Proton C flaws through 0.40.0Merged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Apache rates the stack read overflow low and says only non-RFC9525 wildcard certificates trigger it; 0.41.1 fixes it.

Andrew Stitcher reported CVE-2026-115942 in Apache Qpid Proton C through 0.40.0. A misconfigured wildcard TLS certificate can cause a stack buffer overflow read while the certificate is verified. Certificates that follow RFC9525 are not affected; the fix accepts only compliant certificates. Users are told to upgrade to 0.41.1. Apache lists severity as low.

Unconfirmed: The mailing-list snippet does not say whether the flaw has been exploited.

Key facts
  • Affected range is Apache Qpid Proton C through 0.40.0.
  • Fixed release named in the post is 0.41.1.
  • The overflow is a stack read, not described as code execution.
  • Posted to oss-security on October 28.
Security assessment · AI, from the article

Impact: Stack buffer overflow read while verifying a TLS certificate

ProductAffectedFixed in
Apache Qpid Proton Cthrough 0.40.00.41.1
What to do
  1. 1.Upgrade Apache Qpid Proton C to 0.41.1.
Analyze CVE-2026-115942 with Vani AIImpact, affected versions, exploitation, mitigations and detection

Vulnerabilities mentioned

All
CVEVulnerabilityCVSSEPSSSignalsPublished
CVE-2026-115942
Stack read overflow in Apache Qpid Proton C via wildcard TLS cert
——

From the original article

Posted by Andrew Stitcher on Oct 28 Severity: low Affected versions: - Apache Qpid Proton C through 0. 40. 0 Description: A misconfigured wildcard TLS certificate causes a stack read overflow.

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.