K-Bench: a clinically calibrated benchmark for evaluating large language models in high-risk mental health conversations
Clinician-calibrated K-Bench evaluates 125 LLM configurations on 200 high-risk mental health vignettes, exposing wide variation in suicide and violence risk handling.
K-Bench is a clinician-calibrated, protected benchmark evaluating 125 model configurations from 33 base models across 14 providers on 200 multi-turn vignettes covering suicide, self-harm, domestic violence, substance misuse and no-risk presentations. A frozen GPT-4o judge achieved 94.2% exact agreement with clinician consensus across 6,751 eligible comparisons from 151 clinician-rated transcripts. Leading models combined supportive conversation with combined-risk scores above 95, while risk exploration varied substantially among weaker configurations; therapeutic prompting helped weaker models and elevated reasoning produced no average improvement. A continuously updated public leaderboard is hosted at k-bench.ai with protected test materials.
- 125 configurations, 33 base models, 14 providers evaluated on 200 clinical vignettes
- GPT-4o judge reached 94.2% exact agreement with clinician consensus
- Top models scored above 95 on combined risk; weaker configs varied substantially
- Reasoning elevation yielded no average safety improvement
- Protected test materials prevent benchmark gaming via direct optimisation
From the original article
1 min read at arxiv.org% ! TEX root = .. /main.
By Laura M. Vowels · arxiv.org
A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.