Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

IQ.Lvbs claims Comma.ai IP tried to steal its driving model

Original title: Auto tech startup claims it traced hack attempt back to rival's IP address

The Register · Securityby Thomas Claburn ()2 min read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

The startup says attempts ran October 7-14 and is reviewing legal options; Comma.ai has not commented.

Automotive startup IQ.Lvbs claims that from October 7 to 14 people tried to steal its NovaSpark driving model, access users' devices and private driving files, and exploit its sign-in system. It says the first requests came from an IP assigned to Comma.ai Inc. Comma.ai and CTO Harald Schäfer did not respond to The Register. A Discord post attributed to Schäfer alleged NovaSpark was fine-tuned from Comma.ai's Rebellious Hope model, which IQ.Lvbs disputes.

Unconfirmed: The intrusion, IP attribution and motive are IQ.Lvbs claims; Comma.ai has not responded.

Key facts
  • NovaSpark private beta was announced in the Comma.ai Discord on October 3.
  • IQ.Lvbs says its team was banned from that Discord on October 8.
  • Published logs flag GitHub username haraschax, which Schäfer uses.
  • NHTSA is investigating whether Comma.ai automation contributed to five crashes and three deaths.
  • IQ.Lvbs says it is considering involving authorities.
Security assessment · AI, from the article

Impact: Alleged attempts to steal a model and access devices and files

Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

2 min read at theregister.com

An automotive tech startup claims that its IT systems were attacked by individuals trying to steal its driving model, and that those attacks came from an IP address associated with a rival in the space. The tech startup, IQ. Lvbs, described the alleged security incident in a recent blog post .

The Register · Security

By Thomas Claburn · theregister.com

Read the full article at The Register · Security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.