Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Bind vulnerabilities allow denial of service in Ubuntu 26.10

Original title: USN-8969-1: Bind vulnerabilities

Ubuntu Security Notices ()1
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Bind mishandling of DNS messages and DNSSEC proofs could cause excessive memory use or crashes in Ubuntu 26.10.

It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled certain DNS messages with repeated singleton records such as SOA, CNAME, or DNAME records. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to use excessive memory, leading to a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.10. (CVE-2026-75029) It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled cached DNSSEC proofs. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.10. (CVE-2026-19662) It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled certain invalid DNSSEC records. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to use…

Key facts
  • Bind mishandles repeated singleton DNS records causing excessive memory use
  • Bind mishandles cached DNSSEC proofs causing crash
  • Only affects Ubuntu 26.10
Security assessment · AI, from the articleNo known exploitation

Impact: denial of service

Analyze CVE-2026-75029 with Vani AIImpact, affected versions, exploitation, mitigations and detection

Vulnerabilities mentioned

All
CVEVulnerabilityCVSSEPSSSignalsPublished
CVE-2026-19662
+1 related CVE
Use-after-free denial of service in ISC BIND 9 recursive resolver (named)
5.9
group max
—

From the original article

It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled certain DNS messages with repeated singleton records such as SOA, CNAME, or DNAME records. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to use excessive memory, leading to a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.

Ubuntu Security Notices

ubuntu.com

Read the full article at Ubuntu Security Notices

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.