Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

DISCO: Distributed Long Context Scaling with Grounding-Reasoning Disaggregation

Hugging Face daily papersby Guanzheng Chen, Viet Dac Lai, Subhojyoti Mukherjee ()1 min read6 · 1 read
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

DISCO assigns long-context grounding to worker LLMs so a driver model avoids context rot.

DISCO disaggregates contextual grounding from reasoning to counter context rot in advertised million-token windows. Worker LLMs perform parallel localized extraction, while a central driver LLM trained with GRPO plans atomic tasks and synthesizes a final answer from gathered evidence. On RULER-QA at 1 million tokens it maintains 78.4% accuracy where standard baselines collapse, and it outperforms full-context models by up to 9.8 points on LongBench v2. It matches Gemini-3-Pro-Preview while reducing inference cost by more than 80%.

Key facts
  • Worker LLMs ground long context in parallel; a GRPO-trained driver synthesizes the answer.
  • Holds 78.4% accuracy on RULER-QA at one million tokens as baselines collapse.
  • Beats full-context models by up to 9.8 points on LongBench v2.
  • Matches Gemini-3-Pro-Preview while cutting inference cost by more than 80%.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at huggingface.co

While Large Language Models (LLMs) advertise million-token context windows, reasoning quality often collapses as inputs grow -- a phenomenon termed context rot. This failure stems from a structural entanglement in monolithic architectures, where the massive search burden of contextual grounding exhausts the representational capacity needed for complex reasoning.

Hugging Face daily papers

By Guanzheng Chen, Viet Dac Lai, Subhojyoti Mukherjee · huggingface.co

Read the full article at Hugging Face daily papers

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.