Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Gartner: 70% of SOCs will pilot AI agents. Only 15% will see results

Help Net Security ()7 min read5 · 2 reads
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Gartner predicts 70% of large SOCs will pilot AI agents by 2028, but only 15% will achieve measurable improvements.

A Gartner report by analysts Craig Lawson and Andrew Davies projects that by 2028, 70% of large SOCs will pilot AI agents for Tier 1 and Tier 2 operations, but only 15% will achieve measurable improvements without structured evaluation. Prophet Security's State of AI in Security Operations 2026 survey found 40% of security teams use AI daily and 56% are evaluating or piloting it. The report offers evaluation questions covering workload reduction, TDIR outcomes, vendor viability, analyst upskilling, and autonomy boundaries to counter AI washing in the market.

Key facts
  • 40% of security teams use AI daily; only 4% have no plans
  • 72% of AI-using teams report cutting investigation time by at least 25%
  • 46% of homegrown SOC AI builds were abandoned, shelved, or replaced
  • 28% of alerts are never investigated; 60% say missed alerts proved material
  • 38% of respondents say proactive hunts found activity detections missed
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

7 min read at helpnetsecurity.com

In the Gartner report Validate the Promises of AI SOC Agents With These Key Questions, analysts Craig Lawson and Andrew Davies posit that “By 2028, 70% of large SOCs will pilot AI agents to augment Tier 1 and Tier 2 operations, but only 15% will achieve measurable improvements without structured evaluation.” Just last year, Gartner placed AI SOC Agents at the Innovation Trigger stage with single-digit adoption.

Help Net Security

helpnetsecurity.com

Read the full article at Help Net Security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.