Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

LiveMACE: Process-Aware Evaluation of LLM Agent Capabilities in Evolving Markets

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Jun Zhao ()1 min read4 · 2 reads
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

LiveMACEBench evaluates persistent LLM agents in live markets, separating returns from capability-specific mechanism use.

Researchers introduce LiveMACEBench, a process-aware benchmark that runs persistent LLM agents in live financial markets for 30 days. Five frontier models are compared under matched tool use, persistent memory, rule following, and multi-agent collaboration settings. Realized returns often diverge from mechanism-specific diagnostics taken from complete decision traces, so similar outcomes can reflect different capability patterns. The authors argue that mechanism access, effective use, and downstream performance are not interchangeable measures.

Key facts
  • LiveMACEBench tracks persistent agents across 30 days of live markets.
  • Five frontier LLMs are tested under four matched capability setups.
  • Realized returns often diverge from trace-level capability diagnostics.
  • Similar outcomes can come from different mechanism-use patterns.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Evaluating agents by outcomes alone can obscure the capabilities that produce them. This problem is especially pronounced in evolving environments, where outcomes reflect a closed-loop interaction between agent behavior and changing external conditions. We introduce LiveMACEBench, a process-aware benchmark that uses live financial markets as a naturally evolving testbed for persistent LLM agents.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Jun Zhao · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.